2024 Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Author: rmhw

August undefined, 2024

WebWelcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. All questions and photographic experience levels welcome! WebThe EF lenses will adapt onto the R-series bodies and work the same as—if not better than—on DSLR bodies, so there's definitely nothing wrong with buying a EF version and adapting it, especially considering the price difference between EF and RF.

Canon RF vs Sony E-Mount Lens Ecosystems : r/Cameras - reddit

WebOptically, the RF50/1.2 and RF85/1.2 L's are worlds better than the EF variants. They are much faster in AF speed and their sharpness when shot wide-open is unreal. Whether that's worth it to you or not, that's up to you to decide, but for someone that values these aspects, it is very much worth it. 19 MintyMarlfox • 3 yr. ago WebThe RP has the same sensor as the 6Dii, which according to DxOMark scores, has about 1.5 stops less DR than the SL2 at ISO 100. That difference decreases to both performing pretty much equally at ISO 400, and at higher ISOs the 6Dii sensor offers an extra stop of DR. So I think the notion that the SL2 "blows the EOS RP out of the water" is a ... riverstone tacky

Upgrade from 80D to R6 or R7, considering my lenses …

WebNov 23, 2024 · For this purpose these lenses have been compared: Canon RF 50mm 1.2L. Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L. Canon EF 50mm 1.2L. … WebWelcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. We also sometime talk about other canon equipment such as printers. All questions and photographic experience levels welcome! WebCanon and Sony prices are comparable for similar quality but Sony does have far more lower-end lenses, plus third-party lenses. Both systems adapt EF lenses well (use the Sigma MC-11 for Sony). Canon has some unique RF lenses that might push you to them. The 70-200 f2.8 is VERY compact. riverstone taiping

EF 24-70 vs RF 24-70 : r/canon - reddit.com

Is RF glass that much better? : r/canon - reddit

WebNov 23, 2024 · Specifically the 24-70mm ($600 more for RF), and the 70-200mm ($800 more). If you have existing EF lenses, I would run with those for now. I have three EF … WebEF 100-400 II vs. RF 100-500. I recently picked up an R6 Mark ii and I’ve been trying to decide which lens to buy out of these two. I’m going to be using these primarily for wildlife, which I don’t have much experience with, but I’ve heard so many different opinions about which lens is better. smokeys real estateWebEF lenses are designed for Canon's DSLR cameras, while RF lenses are specifically created for Canon's mirrorless cameras. RF lenses have a larger mount diameter, which allows them to transmit more information between the lens and camera body. This means that RF lenses can offer faster autofocus and better image stabilization. riverstone syndicate 3500

"WebNo loss in image quality or autofocus performance, at all, when using a basic EF-to-EF-M or EF-to-RF adapter. All a basic adapter does is push the lens out to be the correct distance from the sensor in order to properly focus the light, and extend the electrical contacts out so that the body can communicate with the lens. " - Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Canon RF vs EF lenses? Worth extra $? Canon Forums

WebRF lenses have to be placed much closer to the sensor than EF, so if you have a mirrorless RF body you can adapt EF lenses to it, but there's no way to do this in reverse (you'd have to somehow jam the lenses almost an extra inch into your camera.) 3 kickstand • 21 days ago EF or EF-S lenses only. Not RF, not EF-M, not the old Canon FD. 2 WebI currently own the EF 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS II, TS-E 24mm f/3.5L, TS-E 17mm f/4L, and RF 70-200mm f/4L. I'd say that they all seem to have fairly similar build quality and construction materials. I certainly haven't noticed any dramatic differences when out shooting.

Did you know?

WebJan 11, 2016 · EF traditionally had both types of zoom operation. All of the big white RF models so far are extending zooms: RF 70-200/2.8 RF 70-200/4 RF 100-500/4.5-7.1 … WebIt's going to take a long time before Canon will be fully transitioned from EF to RF and because of that, Canon has announced a hand-full of EF-RF mount adapters for using …

WebMost Canon EF lenses should work fine or better on the R6. Some exceptions do exist, impacting AF coverage and / or fps. With 3rd party lenses there is a higher risk of the same issues occurring, especially with older ones that can't be updated - some of them use lens ids that Canon used for lenses that don' t perform well on the R series. WebOld 'L' EF zoom lenses vs. new RF 'non-L' primes. I recently decided to get back into photography and bought a Canon RP body. It seemed like a great price point to test the waters with the hobby again; I also really liked the small form factor for a full frame sensor. I have two lenses from a past life: an EF 24-70m, 2.8 L and a EF 70-200mm 2.8L.

WebWhether the lens is EF or EF-S makes NO difference here. Focal length is focal length and field of view is determined by focal length and the physical size of the sensor. All an EF-S lens tells you is that the lens doesn't have reasonable quality outside the cropped sensor of … Web4. FantasticGlass • 7 mo. ago. The L series RF glass handles CA and flaring better and is a bit sharper wide open. But compared to the most modern EF glass it's actually pretty close. The biggest difference I noticed was CA, the RF L glass has basically none. It's impressive.

WebWhat’s the quality difference like between the new RF lenses and the old EF lenses? Will clients likely notice the difference? 0 comments 50% Upvoted Log in or sign up to leave a comment Log In Sign Up Sort by: best no comments yet Be the first to share what you think! More posts from the canon community 291 Posted by u/ImaHazardtoSociety smokeys research chemsWebHmm the specs on the 80d are decent other than crop sensor. I think the RP is a good step up - but only if it’s cos you don’t want to spend a few extra $ on the R. If you want a rugged body the canon rp is perhaps not the way to go. I played with one at the canon gallery in Osaka Japan last week. smokey spur amherst wiWebJun 6, 2024 · The Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM lens - an optical masterpiece. Neat 6 minutes video by BorrowLenses telling differences between Canon’s RF mount for mirrorless cameras and EF mount for … riverstone technologyWebR5 user with RF / EF lenses here. EF Compatibilty is great. No loss whatsoever. RF glass is more advanced & optimized for new system, tho. You will notice f/2.8 AND Image Stabilizer in RF lenses where the EF counterpart had either 2.8 OR IS (e.g. EF 16-35 f/2.8 OR f/4 IS, same with 24-70, not valid for 70-200). smokey sriracha hot chili sauce bouchon noirWebHelp me decide: Fujifilm X-T5 vs Canon EOS R8. after neglecting my beloved hobby in the last few years/unpacking my cameras far too seldom, the fascination grabbed me again. After some market research, I came across camera models that caught my attention: the Fujifilm X-T5 and the EOS R8. I know that these are two very different cameras, and to ... smokeys rotherhamWebThese include a 24-105 f4 L, 35 f2, 50 f1.8 and 18-135 USM. I love using the 80D/35 f2 as a walk around setup. If I trade in all my crop sensor kit to mpb.com, I should receive around £750, according to a recent quote. The cost of a second hand R6 is around £1,900 while an R7 is around £1,400 (both including ef-rf adaptor). riverstone sydney nswWebJan 11, 2016 · The RF 70-200/2.8 is my favourite major-change lens. To me, the size and weight difference over the EF is very real, and well-worth the telescoping action. Probably the RF70-200/4 is a huge improvement in usability too, but I've never shot with it. I like it even better than the RF100-500 vs the EF100-400. ••• smokeys solventless extracts